In studying the topic of partnership and working together I found myself writing different phrases that mean the same thing:
Churches that partner together.
Churches that work together.
Churches who work alone.
To simplify my writing and note taking I am creating new words: multichurch, monochurch, and cochurch.
These aren’t the only ones I am sure to create in my lifetime. I don’t expect much publicity, or recognition pertaining to these words. Most people don’t remember who coined what word. Who coined the word megachurch?
If there is a megachurch, is there such a thing as a microchurch? Or are there only churches and megachurches? Anyways…
Let me define these terms and how I am going to use them.
Multichurch: an association of churches in an area partnered towards a goal or set of goals. This is different than a denomination in that several traditions will be in the same multichurch. Also, I did not want to use the word “ecumenical” because it tends toward a larger body, a global body. My focus will be more localized within a city, town, or area. I will also make use of “multichurch culture” to describe the paradigm I am promoting: a culture where local churches work together for evangelism and outreach.
Monochurch – a church that does not work with other churches, and may even work against other churches. These churches are sceptical of other traditions. Some may even see these churches as heretical. Monochurch culture refers the current culture within the Church today.
Cochurch – an individual church that exists within a multichurch (much like the word coworker). The church is partnered with another church or group of churches. I may not use this word as much as the others.
Tell me what you think? Do you think these words are adequate? Do you think they’ll catch on?